|
STFFN newsletter - May
/ June 2001
Back
to top
Fertilising
pines - aids to decision making
By Dr Clive Carlyle, CSIRO Forestry
and Forest Products. From ‘Onwood’, Research updates from CSIRO
Forestry and Forest Products, Autumn 2001 No 32
New findings from CSIRO's Plantation
Forest Research Centre at Mt Gambier, South Australia, are helping
decision-making by radiata pine plantation managers on mid-rotation
fertiliser application.
Applying nitrogen or phosphorus fertiliser,
or both, five to eight years before harvest can significantly boost
the economic return from a plantation. As well as increasing wood
production, the resulting extra growth lifts the price obtained
per cubic metre if logs move into a larger diameter class. The relatively
rapid return on the investment in fertiliser is a further advantage.
The growth response of plantations varies
greatly, however. Economic analyses have shown that internal rates
of return from mid-rotation fertilisation range from negative figures
-reflecting a negligible effect on tree growth -to a very healthy
28%.
Managers need to predict the response, and
generally base their estimates on analyses of nutrient levels in
the foliage. With nitrogen, for example, readings below 1.2% suggest
trees will give a good response to fertilisation. Above 1.5% the
response is likely to be weak or non-existent.
Unfortunately, most plantations fall into
the marginal range for nitrogen -1.2-1.5% -where predictions are
highly uncertain. A similar situation exists with the other key
nutrient, phosphorus.
In experiments set up in collaboration with
industry at 18 sites in South Australia, Victoria and Tasmania,
Dr Clive Carlyle of CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products found the
growth boost from mid-rotation nitrogen fertilisation ranged from
zero up to an impressive 30%. Conventional foliar analysis proved
a poor predictor of the outcome, explaining only about 30% of the
variation in response. Its success rate in predicting the impact
of phosphorus fertilisation was about the same.
A key aim of the research has been to develop
better prediction tools, and results to date are highly promising.
Carlyle found that analysis of the balance of nitrogen to phosphorus
in foliage gives a much better indication of the potential of a
plantation to respond to nitrogen fertilisation than nitrogen readings
alone, explaining about 65% of the variation in response. For phosphorus,
linking foliar analysis with a measure of the amount of foliage
in a plantation lifts the figure to a similar level.
Concerns about accuracy have not been the
only problem with foliar analysis; it also presents practical problems.
Selecting representative samples of the foliage is difficult, and
collecting them from tall trees is expensive as limbs have to be
shot down. So, as well as investigating ways to improve foliage-based
tests, Carlyle and his colleagues are researching alternatives.
Excellent results have been obtained in early
trials of one soil-based test. Carlyle found that analyses based
on an index of nitrogen and phosphorus availability in the soil
explained about 90% of the variation in response to mid-rotation
nitrogen fertilisation. A forest company has begun using the method
to guide its fertiliser applications.
Other outcomes of the research are suggesting
ways to ensure mid-rotation fertilisation produces the maximum possible
economic response. The CSIRO team has found that any limitation
in phosphorus nutrition, even where trees would not normally be
considered phosphorus deficient, will prevent trees responding to
their potential to nitrogen additions. The CSIRO team can now quantify
this limitation, enabling managers to objectively decide on the
need to apply nitrogen alone or in combination with phosphorus.
The research also raises important considerations about the way
in which nitrogen and phosphorus fertilisers are currently applied
to plantations.
The research has been conducted in collaboration
with Auspine Ltd, ForestrySA, Green Triangle Forest Products, and
Norske Skog.
Back
to top
New
Zealand Farm Forestry Association (NZFFA) 45th Annual Conference
By Rebecca Blundell
The New Zealand Farm Forestry Association
(NZFFA) was formed in 1957, and currently has over 4000 members
managing over 200,000ha of forest worth approx. $2 Billion. These
forest areas consist of Radiata Pine, Cypresses, Eucalypts, Douglas
Fir, Blackwood, Poplars as well as a range of North American hardwoods
and indigenous NZ species. Around 800 of NZFFA members will on average
harvest 12.7ha over the next 5 years. These mature forest plantations
have a market value of approx. $300 million.
The Hawke’s Bay Branch of the NZFFA hosted
the 45th Annual Conference. Hawke’s Bay is a region of diverse land
use – from pines to vines and everything in between. The region
is home to 114,000 hectares of Pine plantation and 36 wineries.
Landforms range from mountains, down to hills and through to river
valleys, terraces and coastal plains. Unlike Australia, the soils
are generally fertile, however the rainfall in parts of Hawke’s
Bay is a familiar 700mm per year. 385 people attended the conference
from New Zealand, Australia, Santiago Chile and Nevada USA.
The conference’s theme was Balancing Diversity
and field excursions explored the diverse reasons for planting trees
in Hawke’s Bay:
- Trees for Clean water
- Trees to stop erosion
- Trees for shelter and shade
- Trees for birds, beasts and business,
and
- Trees for the heart and soul.
The farm foresters of Hawke’s Bay are leading
the way in creating sustainable land use patterns, with a mosaic
of productive plantations, sheltering highly productive pastures
and healthy stock.
The silvicultural management of radiata pine
in Hawke’s Bay is aimed at sawlog production. Plantations are typically
pruned to 6 metres and thinned to 200-250 stems per hectare. There
are local and export markets for pulp, and sawlogs through Pan Pac
Forests Products just north of Hawke’s Bay, and the port of Napier.
Although it may seem that New Zealand is
leaps and bounds ahead of Australia in farm forestry, it needn’t
be disheartening, but inspiring. Many New Zealand farmers were told
they were crazy planting various trees on their properties with
no guaranteed markets or returns. Dairy farmers were told their
cows would become lazy with too much shade, lying down all day instead
of eating grass! Now, the majority of farmers who have planted trees
for various reasons are laughing all the way to the bank. So, the
message from NZ is ‘don’t give up’ and focus on high quality high
value products.
Back
to top
Pruning
– Genetics
The main focus, in any discussion about pruning
P. radiata, is usually on techniques, equipment and cost.
Little attention is given to the most important variable, that of
the trees themselves. This is a little suprising as the characteristics
of the individual tree affects the cost more than any other factor.
Trees which are expensive to prune and will
yield the least clearwood are ones which have;
- large branches
- steep angles between the branches and
stem
- few whorls
- many branches per whorl.
- many fascicles on the stem
- A combination of all of these.
These trees are difficult to prune and are
adversely affected by the removal of branches as there is often
less green material above the target DOS than the tree needs to
quickly recover from the pruning.
If the stocking is high enough these are
the trees which are rejected and are unpruned.
The ideal tree has the following characteristics;
- small branches
- wide angle between the branches and the
stem
- multi whorled
- relatively few branches per whorl
- few fascicles on the stem
- a combination of all of these
These trees are easy to prune and are less
affected by the removal of branches because they have relatively
more green material above the pruning. The branch occludes quicker
and as a result the defect core is closer to the DOS than is the
case for trees with large branches.
The angle of the branch makes a great deal
of difference to the pruning operation. High angle branches are
difficult to remove and can be dangerous as they fall.
Contract pruners are expert in identifying
easy and difficult trees, this of course, is part of the expertise
which is used to assess the costing of the work
Given these factors are so important to pruning
one may have expected that material which has the desired characteristics
would be routinely planted by those who need to prune their trees.
That is small growers in regions where there is no pulp market or
growers aiming for peeler logs.
The technology to produce such plants is
well known. It has been possible to produce cuttings with the desired
characteristics for some time. The extra price of such material
is more than compensated for in the cost of pruning and the concomitant
increase in clearwood.
This hidden aspect of pruning should be given
far more attention by growers, before planting, than it has to date.
Back
to top
Potassium
can boost young pines
By Dr Philip Smethurst, CSIRO Forestry
and Forest Products. From ‘Onwood’, Research updates from CSIRO
Forestry and Forest Products, Autumn 2001 No 32
Research in Tasmania has shown that
fertilisation with potassium can be important in
achieving maximum growth in young
radiata pine plantations on ex-pasture land in drier
regions of Australia.
Dr Philip Smethurst and colleagues from CSIRO
Forestry and Forest Products and the CRC for Sustainable Production
Forestry, including Arthur Lyons from Private Forests Tasmania,
found trees showing needle yellowing in a 2 year old plantation
had very low potassium concentrations in their foliage –about half
those considered necessary for good growth. Concentrations in trees
that were still relatively green were only about two thirds the
acceptable levels.
In a subsequent experiment at this site they
found that, after one year, a combination of weed removal and potassium
fertilisation dramatically improved tree colour, foliar potassium
concentrations and tree growth. Removing weeds had a considerable
effect on its own, presumably through reducing competition for the
potassium in the soil; foliar concentrations rose to the levels
commonly accepted as adequate. However, addition of potassium had
a further substantial impact. Together, weed control and potassium
fertilisation more than doubled tree growth rates.
Smethurst suggests these results highlight
the difficulty of diagnosing potassium deficiency using commonly
accepted critical concentrations. "Where visual symptoms are
evident, a comparison of concentrations in foliage of healthy and
unhealthy trees might be more instructive than the commonly used
method of comparing concentrations in the foliage of unhealthy trees
with a critical concentration developed in different circumstances,"
he says.
He does not find the discovery of potassium
deficiency in plantations on ex- pasture sites surprising, noting
that the nutrient is not normally applied to pastures, and the continual
removal of large amounts in animal and plant products must deplete
soil supplies. He says drought can exacerbate the problem, because
adequate soil moisture is needed for nutrients to move readily through
the soil to roots.
While potassium deficiency in forest plantations
has not been observed in Tasmania previously, it was documented
about 30 years ago in Gippsland, Victoria, where it was also most
noticeable on ex- pasture sites. Recently, potassium deficiency
has been suspected in Eucalyptus globulus plantations on ex-pasture
land in WA, and research is planned to check this.
Smethurst suggests that, where potassium
addition is needed, the appropriate fertiliser regime may be a light
application of muriate of potash at planting followed by a further
application at about age two years when the canopy is rapidly developing.
The rate of fertilisation required will depend on conditions at
the site.
Back
to top
The
Aphids are out there
Biology and Ecology of Essigella
californica (Essig)
Trudi Wharton
In 1998, it was discovered that the hills
were alive with the exotic aphid Essigella californica, a
pest of Pinus radiata. It made its first fatal mistake by
climbing on the arm of an entomologist at CSIRO who alerted Dr Mary
Carver, the CSIRO resident aphid taxonomist. Further investigation
discovered that E. californica was happily sucking away in
the P.radiata plantations out there, and has since been found
in all States and Territories where P.radiata is grown. Naturally
the Forest industry were a little disturbed about the idea of an
aphid running loose in their forests and have funded my project,
with the aim of answering some of the questions on E. californica’s
biology , ecology, and insect-plant interactions.
Pinus radiata is a native pine
of California and has been increasingly used as a plantation timber
world wide. As P. radiata has spread, so it seems has E.
californica. Despite this, E.californica has not been
studied to any degree in the USA or elsewhere, so there was little
information available when E.californica turned up on pine
here.
E.californica feeding causes
P.radiata needles to turn yellow, and when shed, result in
a yellow carpet effect especially in older plantations.
Needles along the main trunk and upper crown
are damaged in 4-6 year old trees. Older trees (20-25 year old)
damaged in the upper third to quarter of the tree. Needle loss results
in reduced photosynthesis and hence lower growth rate in P.radiata
plantations, resulting in a loss to the Industry of 17.3 million
dollars per year.
Essigella californica, exhibits
parthenogenetic (asexual) reproduction and has a short generation
time. This allows them to increase their population size rapidly.
The aptera (wingless morph) is spindle shaped with grey green thorax
and lime green abdomen. It’s body length is 1.5-2.0mm.
It is an extremely excitable and active aphid,
and will move rapidly and evasively at the slightest disturbance,
usually to the base of the needle, or it will drop off the tree.
Surprisingly these aphids have only 3 larval
forms, compared with 4 larval forms in other aphids. The difference
in the number of larval forms may be a consequence of the earlier
evolution of aphids living on Gymnosperms compared with the later
expansion of aphids onto Angiosperms.
Back
to top
Bioenergy
Australia
Bioenergy Australia is a group of 34 Australian
government and private sector organizations formed to promote the
development of biomass energy in Australia. On Tuesday 10th
April the Joint Venture Agroforestry Program and Bioenergy Australia
held a seminar on the aspects of growing, harvesting and the economics
of short rotation woody crops (SRCs) for energy generation in Australia.
It was an opportunity to hear of the progress of the Bioenergy Task
Force, in particular Task 17; Short Rotation Crops for Bioenergy.
Biomass as an energy source is plant and
animal materials that can be used to supply heat, electricity and
fuels. It is viewed as a renewable alternative to coal, oil and
natural gas. Types of Biomass employed as an energy source include
wood and wood wastes, agricultural residues, oil seeds, sewage sludge
and animal manure. In Australia, biomass accounts for less than
5% of our energy supply, the global figure is about 14%.
The interest in biomass came about through
concerns for global warming, largely resulting from release of ‘greenhouse
gases’ by coal, oil and natural gas combustion. According to the
International Energy Association (IEA) Bioenergy, energy derived
from burning or conversion of woody crops, biomass residues and
wastes, could be a cost effective and sustainable way of meeting
an increasing part of the world's energy needs in the next century.
If power plants fuelled by biomass contributed
1000 megawatts (MW) of Australia’s electricity generating capacity
(an achievable level), this would displace an equivalent capacity
of coal-fired power plant and net carbon dioxide emissions would
fall by about 7.4 million tonnes a year.
It is hoped that many of the agro-forests
being planted all over Australia today could be used for energy
production in the future. STFFN will keep all its members up-to-date
on the future of this exciting new opportunity for forest growers.
More information on Bioenergy is available at:
http://renewable.greenhouse.gov.au/technologies/biomass/biomass.html
Back to top
|